Contained in a massive release of records from Green Dot Charter Schools that I received in June 2019 are hundreds of emails between Green Dot Supreme Commander Cristina de Jesus and her co-conspirators on something called the Los Angeles Advocacy Council.1 The LAAC is one of a number of local lobbying groups sponsored by the California Charter School Association and staffed by various charter school honchos.2
The minutes of their meetings along with the handouts, policy statements, and so on, many of which were included in the record release, provide a fairly shocking picture of the CCSA’s appalling activities. I am still trying to organize even the LAAC materials, but have finally managed to separate them out, export them as PDFs, and extract all the attachments. This still-complex set of records is now available here on Archive.Org.3
And just as an example of the incredible revelatory nature of this material, take a look at this packet of reading materials prepared by CCSA for an October 2018 event called the Executive Summit. Even this single document is far too rich, too complex, for me to discuss completely in one4 post. It contains, among many, many other essential pieces of information, various proposed changes to CCSA’s mission, goals, and so on. For instance, CCSA’s current mission statement reads:
A million students attending charter public schools by 2022, with charter public schools outperforming non-charter public schools on every measure.
And, at least in October 2018, they were proposing to change this to:
Every student in California attending a great charter school, or a great charter-like public school, by 2030.
It’s not clear at all what they mean by “charter-like public school[s]”. It’s especially unclear given the amount of time they spend ranting about how charter schools are in fact public schools,5 so presumably charter schools are the most charter-like public schools of all, but whatever. The point is that this is an acknowledgement by the CCSA that they are in fact trying to destroy public education in California by removing ALL students from it or, if that’s not possible, making public schools be so much like their private charters that there might as well be no public education. In any case, please read the whole document. It is a revelation.
And they’re not just trying to destroy all public schools in California by taking away their students and, with them, their funding. They’re also trying to take away all their land. On a local level they have been working with LAUSD Board Member Nick Melvoin on a proposal to take facilities away from putatively low-performing schools and hand them over to putatively high-performing schools. And before facilities can be confiscated on the basis of performance, a ranking system is necessary. Melvoin’s recent school performance ranking proposal is step one in this playbook.
And the CCSA and its member schools don’t just want control or ownership of the property to help them educate children. Real estate is a key element of the private charter school investment market. The more real estate charter schools control the more money the private investors can make. This is a huge business.
And in the collection of LAAC records, there’s a fairly complete set of minutes of LAAC meetings from between January 2018 and April 2019.6 And the minutes are incredibly detailed, with transcribed comments from the various charter school brain trusters in attendance, and so on. Take a look, just for instance, at these CONFIDENTIAL minutes from March 2018.7
At this meeting the LAAC discussed their “Facilities North Star,” which is what they call this whole plan to condition access to LAUSD real estate on meeting certain performance standards. And they’re musing on how to push this to the Board and to the public, and Cristina de Jesus of Green Dot Charter Schools remarks:
what is the cost benefit analysis? What is our leverage here? It’s not like DRL8 where we can submit without it. I think our leverage is money. Money that our sector can bring through long-term partnerships.
And then, in an uncharacteristically honest moment, or at least an honest moment uncharacteristically exposed to public view, TED-talking tousle-haired charter school boy genius Oliver Sicat, now of outlaw CMO Ednovate,9 replied that actually CCSA’s plans for facilities would not in fact help the district. Quite the opposite, says Oliver Sicat, who reveals that the CCSA, which relentlessly pushes what they’re incomprehensibly shameless enough to call a “kids first” agenda, is promoting a policy that will enrich private charter school investors at the expense of LAUSD:
We did go deep into that analysis. It works well for people who fund us. Not necessarily for the district. This district was on the brink of bankruptcy, about to close schools, and no one cared.
And finally, the minutes are shot through with internal discussions about messaging, about strategies for pushing their agendas, and so on. With respect to this one, about facilities, they’re quite clear on the fact that it’s delicate, that being too open about their goals will turn people against them. As they say, “That will give UTLA all the fodder they need.” And they’re not shy about their plans for the future, either. Let’s close with them counting all the damn unhatched chickens to be provided by their schemes:
We have to be careful of advocating too strongly because this is all likely to lead to some school consolidation and we could be seen as an organization that is advocating for this. That will give UTLA all the fodder they need. And we may ultimately take over operations of those schools.
Image of Oliver Sicat is ©2019 MichaelKohlhaas.Org and then there was this.
- The full set of emails is overwhelmingly rich. I am still trying to sort it out and organize for publication. Right now, though, you can get the whole set as an MBOX file here, import it into Thunderbird or the equivalent, and have access to one of the most important document releases of the 21st Century in the area of California Charter Schools. Get in touch with me (firstname.lastname@example.org) if you want to do this but need some technical advice.
- It’s not clear how many of these Councils there are. Sadly the CCSA itself is not subject to the CPRA, so the only way to understand the workings of the advocacy councils is via requests to the member schools and CMOs. This is a fairly scattershot method, though, and very time consuming. I recently learned of the existence of an Orange County Advocacy Council, and I have some evidence of one or more in the Bay Area, but details have been hard to come by. I will post on this when I have some more information.
- The amount of essential material in there cannot be exaggerated. Please feel free, obviously, to browse, discover, publicize anything you find in there. I’ve also included eml files if you’d like to import the intact emails without importing the whole gigantic MBOX file linked to elsewhere in this post.
- Or even a dozen.
- They’re not, but privatizers insist that they are.
- I am still working on organizing and, in some cases, extracting, these minutes. I plan to publish a directory to these and various other kinds of regularly issued documents in this set. But, as I keep saying, if you have time and patience, it is well worth the effort to browse through the material yourself. You will be amazed, I promise!
- That’s a link to a PDF I exported from the original MS Word document.
- DRL stands for District Required Language. I do not yet understand this issue fully, but I believe that it’s language that LAUSD insists on putting into every charter, a charter being the contract between LAUSD and the charter school describing the required terms of operation. This is a huge, huge issue with CCSA and activist charter schools. There is tons of discussion of it in these emails. As soon as I get a better grasp on what the issues and facts are I am sure I will be writing about it extensively.
- The only concrete information I have on their outlawhood has to do with their cheerfully intransigent refusal to comply with the California Public Records Act, for which they certainly will be called to account, although, for such is the way of the world with respect to such matters, not especially soon. There’s time, though, certainly, there is time for each to be taught their respective lesson. To be taught, I say specifically, because they just will not learn. For self-proclaimed educators they are astonishingly incapable of learning.
5 thoughts on “Top Secret Document Revelations — California Charter Schools Association Aims To Have 100% Of California Students In Charter Schools By 2030 — Or “Charter-Like Public Schools” — Whatever That Means — And To Get Control Of Vast Quantities Of Exceedingly Valuable LAUSD Real Estate — Which Is Worth Untold Zillions Of Dollars To Zillionaire Charter Investors — Privatizing Boy Genius And Supreme Commander Of Outlaw Charter Operator Ednovate Oliver Sicat Acknowledges Out Loud That This Plan “Works Well For People Who Fund Us — Not Necessarily For The District” — Which Undermines CCSA’s Claim To Want To Put “Kids First” To Some Extent”
Wow! This is massive. What can be done with this information?
Look up Green Dot in New Orleans- John Mcdonogh high school. Where are they now? There’s a clip of Joe Scarborough talking about what great real estate it is. Green Dot was the tools of ultimate destruction, which allowed the justification of the total closure and reopening as a white k-8 school.
Also please see Mercedes Schneider’s new post about Walton $ in Louisiana.
What is the financial implication nationally?
In these days of shrinking freedom, with oligarch power slowly but surely nudging aside our Constitutional rights, public education has been an oasis freedom of thought.
Why isn’t this news being broadcast in every way, everywhere???(“Free” Press…) What can the rest of us do to help?
Hmm, this is a few months old, but I’d missed it. Of course they don’t want 100% of children in actual charter schools, because where would they dump the vast number of challenged children the charters won’t touch — which seems to amount to 60% of students, based on their attrition/pushouts. So they still want public schools. But of course “charter-like” public schools means non-union and with temp beginner teachers.
Ednovate lures students which they don’t have the capacity or competency to serve and engages in unethical practices. One of their schools recently had a massive exodus of students due to lack of transparency and inadequate facilities. As a result a large group of staff members were fired without warning. After hearing about this from a friend living in California who is related to an employee, I can no longer support charter schools, even though I’ve been an advocate of them for 30+ years.