Background first. There’s Morrie Goldman. Lobbyist who runs Urban Solutions LLC, a lobbying firm. Famously caught up in the slow motion putrefaction of what was, at one time, known as Jose Huizar’s political career. Well-known friend of Gil Cedillo, at least as the word is understood at 200 N. Spring Street. Favor asker. Supplicant. Then there’s Gil Cedillo. Career politician. Wielder of vast power. Mover. Shaker. Favor granter. Supplicatee.
Or, you know, that’s how I always thought things worked in City Hall. The Councilmembers were in charge and the lobbyists asked them for goodies on behalf of clients and paid them off for their cooperation. But I recently obtained a steaming heap of emails between CD1 staffers and various lobbyists, and amongst them was this email conversation from 2015 between Morrie Goldman and Cedillo chief of staff Debby Kim1 which forces a quantum-level re-envisioning of that narrative, featuring Morrie Goldman as Keyser Soze and Cedillo with nothing more than some kind of walk-on role in his own career.
The whole exchange is just four emails long. Only the first two really matter. A week before the meeting, Goldman emails Kim to ask if Cedillo will be at PLUM on June 23, 2015. He says “We have an item coming to PLUM that day and need him for a quorum. Englander is out.” Kim’s reply? “He will be there :)” So yeah, in case you hadn’t realized, lobbyists don’t only tell Councilmembers how to vote and then deliver payola in return. They also call roll in advance and make sure the reps show up when they’re needed to vote. It’s unexpected and creepy at the same time.
And conceivably it’s also a Brown Act violation, since at that time the entire PLUM committee consisted of Jose Huizar, Cedillo, and Englander. Communications through intermediaries between a majority of the members, which would be two of them, constitutes an illegal serial meeting.2 So Goldman insinuating to Cedillo’s staff that Englander would have voted in favor is probably not OK. The statute of limitations is long gone, though.
And of course, the question of what issue Goldman needed Cedillo present to vote on is an essential one. I don’t yet know for sure, but here’s the PLUM agenda from June 23, 2015. The only matter on there of any consequence is CF 15-0721, which has to do with a CEQA appeal against the AMPAS project on Wilshire, which is likely to be the vote Goldman was worried about. Oh, one more thing! Notice how Goldman doesn’t even have to ask how Cedillo’s voting? That’s all been settled already.
And that’s the sordid little story of who’s calling the shots in the relationships between lobbyists and their pet councilmembers. Turn the page for a transcription of the emails themselves, so ordinary and yet so shocking.
Morrie R. Goldman <mgoldman@urbansolutionsla.com> Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 5:49 PM
To: Debby Kim <debby.kim@lacity.org>
Cc: Arturo Chavez <arturo.chavez@lacity.org>
Subject: PLUM on 6-23
Will Gil be there? We have an item coming to PLUM that day and need him for a quorum. Englander is out.
Sent from my iPhone
Morrie R. Goldman
Office: (213) 689-4745
Mobile: (213)321-7545
MGoldman@UrbanSolutionsLA.com
Debby Kim <debby.kim@lacity.org> Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 8:56 AM
To: “Morrie R. Goldman” <mgoldman@urbansolutionsla.com>
Cc: Arturo Chavez <arturo.chavez@lacity.org>
He will be there:)
Debby Kim
Legislative Affairs
Councilmember Gilbert Cedillo
First Council District
213-473-7001
Morrie R. Goldman <mgoldman@urbansolutionsla.com> Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 8:56 AM
To: Debby Kim <debby.kim@lacity.org>
Cc: Arturo Chavez <arturo.chavez@lacity.org>
Will he be there on 6-30?
Morrie R. Goldman
Urban Solutions LLC
200 S. Los Angeles Street, #311
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Office: 213) 689-4745
Debby Kim <debby.kim@lacity.org> Wed, Jun 17. 2015 at 9:03 AM
To: “Morrie R. Goldman” <mgoldman@urbansolutionsla.com>
Cc: Arturo Chavez <arturo.chavez@lacity.org>
Yes
Image of Debby Kim is ©2019 MichaelKohlhaas.Org and then there was this Debby Kim.
- Who at that time was Cedillo’s legislative director, whatever the heck that is.
- This is the Brown Act at §54952.2(b)(1), which states: “A majority of the members of a legislative body shall not, outside a meeting authorized by this chapter, use a series of communications of any kind, directly or through intermediaries, to discuss, deliberate, or take action on any item of business that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative body.”