Why Is The RAND Corporation Paying Off People In Skid Row To Discuss Public Safety? — The Same RAND Corporation Whose Pro-BID Study Is So Influential That It Is Cited In The Actual Property And Business Improvement District Act — The Same RAND Corporation That’s Funded By The Department Of Homeland Security — The Same RAND Corporation That Justified Carpet Bombing And Torture In The Vietnam War For Robert McNamara — The Same RAND Corporation That Paid “Megadeath Intellectual” Herman Kahn And His Ilk To Theorize About Winnable Nuclear War

The flyer you’re looking at was posted around Downtown Los Angeles recently, seeking participants in discussion groups about “neighborhood safety,” to be paid $25 for 90 minutes of their time. As you can see at the bottom, the moving force behind this was the RAND corporation, a Santa Monica based think tank that has been providing theory-driven rationalizations for all manner of murderous government policies since 1948.

Now, I don’t know what kind of information RAND is looking for here or what they’re planning to use it for, although the multiple layers of deception embedded in the poster itself1 make it hard to believe that they’re working on anything life-affirming. I do know that RAND has a history with business improvement districts in Los Angeles.

BIDs actively collect data about what passes for public safety in zillionaire circles and repurpose it as propaganda in the service of the vast development and gentrification machine in which they are teensy cogs. For instance, as putative evidence that more and more and more police are needed in gentrifying areas, and that those police need increased powers to deal with the putative danger. Or that more and more and more BIDs are needed and that those BIDs need increased powers as well.

Without evidence to the contrary it’s likely that, whatever else the information they’re gathering might be used for, RAND is certainly going to use it for this kind of thing. Or, once published, it will be used for this even if not by RAND. This has happened before. Just for instance, in 2009 RAND released a massive report on Los Angeles BIDs and public safety. Although the results of this study were ambiguous, nevertheless it has been taken up by both BIDs and by governments as weighty evidence in favor of the theory that BIDs reduce crime.

So much so, in fact, that it’s actually cited in the Property and Business Improvement District Act of 1994 as one of the reasons that the State Legislature promotes the formation of business improvement districts, at §36601(e)(1):

Property and business improvement districts formed throughout this state have conferred special benefits upon properties and businesses within their districts and have made those properties and businesses more useful by providing the following benefits … Crime reduction. A study by the Rand Corporation has confirmed a 12-percent reduction in the incidence of robbery and an 8-percent reduction in the total incidence of violent crimes within the 30 districts studied.

Tangentially, this report is surprisingly honest in a weirdly Orwellian sense about what BIDs are up to, much more so than the BIDs themselves ever are. For instance, read this selection,2 wherein the authors “… describe the BIDs in terms of their public safety (or social control), beautification (or broken windows), and marketing (or place promotion).”

Just try to get a BID ever to admit that their public safety programs are social control programs or that their beautification programs are tied in to the infamous broken windows theory. The report does not, however, go so far as to make the connection between so-called beautification and social control, seen e.g. in the love of BIDs for pressure washing sidewalks which, although nominally a cleaning process, also has the effect of relocating homeless people.

In any case, they must really have something to hide, otherwise why would the poster be so utterly deceptive? Just for instance, see the photograph of the “group host.” She’s African American, but they don’t have to say so this way. Also they don’t have to tell her name.

Additionally, see the statement that RAND is “a non-profit research institution that is not affiliated with any law enforcement agencies.” This is actually just a lie. See RAND’s own list of their funding sources. One of them is the Department of Justice, which runs the FBI, which is certainly a law enforcement agency. Not to mention that the vast majority of their funding comes from the U.S. Military and, more importantly, the Department of Homeland Security.

DHS, of course, oversees ICE. ICE is certainly a law enforcement agency or, if not due to some technicality, is as good as one in cities as full of undocumented aliens as Los Angeles. It’s not only a lie for RAND to claim that they’re not affiliated with law enforcement agencies, it’s a pernicious lie.

And the claim that they’re a non-profit research institution sounds pretty innocuous when compared to their actual record, which involves torture during the Vietnam war, not to mention at Guantanamo Bay and in Afghanistan, batshit crazy theorizing about winnable nuclear wars, And so on. The fact that they’re not making a profit off this kind of stuff doesn’t seem that relevant to anything, does it?

So yeah, what is the RAND Corporation holding these discussion groups for? We still don’t know, although eventually we’ll find out. Sadly the RAND Corporation is not subject to the California Public Records Act, nor to the federal Freedom of Information Act. But in order to carry out their nefarious purposes in Los Angeles they must intersect and communicate with the LAPD, with the City Council, with BIDs. So yeah, eventually we’ll find out. Meanwhile, it’s probably better to stay away from this nonsense just in case.

  1. More detail after the break.
  2. PDF p.16.
Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.